Skip to main content

Nowheres

Zadie Smith's trippy short story "Meet the President!" felt like several episodes of Black Mirror and posed a lot of interesting questions. It got me thinking a lot about the idea of "nowhere" and how privilege and reality influence that nowhere. Both Bill and Aggie are from a nowhere, but their experiences and interpretations of each others' upbringing are drastically different.

Bill's "nowhere" is also an "everywhere." His most consistent relationship is with his dad and he sees more through the virtual reality chip in his head than through his real eyes. He can presumably look at whatever location he wants to through the VR thing, but he doesn't have a hometown. He has no tangible ties to anyone, anywhere.

Aggie's "nowhere" is more of a cultural nowhere. Her community is small and insignificant to the bigger influences of the society Bill is a part of. She has a strong sense of place, but according to anyone outside of her sparsely populated area, she's from nowhere. The only people left in her region are "the ones who can't leave."

Bill's nowhere is because he moves around too much. Aggie's is because of the isolation that comes with her location and poverty.

The impact their nowheres have on their characters is another interesting thing. Bill, because of his privilege and somewhat nomadic lifestyle causes him to latch on to his father, constantly seeking approval and trying to prove his independence. The death of his mother combined with his lack of a The lack of resources in Aggie's community forced her to grow up quickly and mature at a young age. Bill doesn't have to acknowledge the issues that come from his kind of nowhere because they aren't as prevalent in his day-to-day life, they lie more under the surface. Aggie, however, is constantly reminded of her circumstances.

The strongest piece of their nowheres, though, is their relationships with others. All of Bill's friends and teachers seemingly communicate through chips in their heads, and his only constant is his busy father. Aggie knows her family and has a strong group of allies supporting her during tough times. Melinda Durham, the old woman Aggie's with at the beginning, knows the history of the area's population. Aggie has a stable community and a history she fits into, while Bill just sort of floats around.

What other differences do y'all see in the impacts of their nowheres?

Comments

  1. Kind of lame that Aggie's hometown is not a nowhere to her, but people's condescension towards her community reduces the significance of what Aggie treasures; whereas Bill is in a presumably more significant/more respected position societally but he doesn't have the same sense of fulfillment Aggie has?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that both of their nowheres stem from their relationships. Aggie's nowhere comes from the transience we see in her relationships (her sister died, her mother-figure that I can't remember the name of just left) more than the town she lives in. Bill's nowhere comes from the fact that he has virtually no relationships, and the one person he does have a relationship with, it's a very rocky one. They both lead pretty sucky lives, brought on by their respective places at either end of the social/socio-economic spectrum. The fact that either end of the spectrum sucks but there doesn't really seem to be a middle class who would presumably be much happier leads me to believe that this world is pretty abysmal and filled with unhappy, unfulfilled people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isolation + Racism

James Baldwin's "Previous Condition" covers a lot of ground. Peter, the protagonist, operates as an artist who rejects black culture and influence but is constantly shut out of white opportunities. His resentment of his racial community is interesting for a lot of reasons, as are his interactions with his white "minority" friends. Peter lives in New York City in the 1940s, a time when black success in the arts was thriving and evolving through jazz. But Peter's a stage actor, a field which often relies more on looking the part than having the talent for it. Peter's existence seems founded in anger, at one point saying "I resented praise and I resented pity," and it seems like there's truly no way for him to feel at ease. It makes sense. As an actor, it would be frustrating to be constantly told that he had the talent but not the skin for success. It would be frustrating to never have a positive black role model, but always be reminded of ...

Childhood: A Temporary? Essence

Most of Salinger’s stories that we've read in class focused on the relationship between children and adults and how the presence of children creates a comfortable environment for adults to let their guard down and show their soft side. “A Perfect Day for Bananafish” is a good example of this. If we judge Seymour solely based on the bits of the story that didn't include Sybil, we can conclude he's kind of a kooky person. Muriel and her mom’s conversation set up the possibility that perhaps he isn't quite right in the head, whether or not you choose to believe the mom’s persistent hints that Seymour’s a lil crazy. Later, during the only scene that depicts him interacting with another adult, Seymour makes a random paranoid comment about the woman looking at his feet. This interaction is definitely weird, but maybe Seymour just wins the award for most awkward person of the year? I’ve been there, I can’t judge. By the end of the story, though, there's no d...

What's the Point, Man?

I really enjoyed Tim O'Brien's The Things They Carried . Or, at least, I really wanted to. There was a consensus in our class of feeling hurt and betrayed by the almost-nonfiction narrative O'Brien delivers. I guess I'm part of the mob. I'm mad at O'Brien, too. I'm not mad that he fudged the truth of his Vietnam experiences in a book of fiction. In almost every story, he tells us that we aren't reading factual information. What I'm mad about is that he didn't stick to the whole meaning of war stories that was pushed throughout the book. O'Brien's Basic War Story consists of who, where, and what The Narrator saw. Usually, readers are left to figure out the meaning, if there was one at all. In "Spin," we are told that "What sticks to memory, often, are those odd little fragments that have no beginning and no end." These stories aren't supposed to have a structure. They're just moments. Memories. The narrator ...